<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multitasking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/</link>
	<description>adding insult to injury since 1999</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>was any one else a witness to this achievement?  i'll give it a try on my windows machine tonight... i too am dork!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was any one else a witness to this achievement?  i&#8217;ll give it a try on my windows machine tonight&#8230; i too am dork!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Um, it really hasn't been that hard to do since possibly Windows NT came out, and definitely since Windows 2000. All the Win 9x OSes sucked, but the NT-based ones have never had difficulty with massive numbers of apps.

I remember running at least 40 or 50 copies of MS Word on NT 3.1 in 1994 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, it really hasn&#8217;t been that hard to do since possibly Windows NT came out, and definitely since Windows 2000. All the Win 9x OSes sucked, but the NT-based ones have never had difficulty with massive numbers of apps.</p>
<p>I remember running at least 40 or 50 copies of <span class="caps">MS </span>Word on <span class="caps">NT 3</span>.1 in 1994 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JISH</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>JISH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>So, what are the 20 apps ... from left to right?  A suggestion (at least I like it), try Transparent Dock (&lt;a href="http://www.aquafiles.com/cgi-bin/aquafiles/jump.cgi?ID=696"&gt;http://www.aquafiles.com/cgi-bin/aquafiles/jump.cgi?ID=696&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what are the 20 apps &#8230; from left to right?  A suggestion (at least I like it), try Transparent Dock (<a href="http://www.aquafiles.com/cgi-bin/aquafiles/jump.cgi?ID=696"></a><a href='http://www.aquafiles.com/cgi-bin/aquafiles/jump.cgi?ID=696'>http://www.aquafiles.com/cgi-bin/aquafiles/jump.cgi?ID=696</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#8217;m mentioning it not because it can&#8217;t be done on a Windows machine (I realize that with XP and OS X almost anything can be done on either operating system), but is it really as seamless ... out of the way? It just struck me as a usability shift for me. I just happened to be running 20 applications, not because I was testing it, but it just happened because I needed or wanted those apps running. When I first installed OS X last year when it came out, I performed a search for file of type &#8220;application&#8221; and opened them all strait from Sherlock. Granted there is no real use for this, and most of the apps are small utilities (as are some in this list) but it&#8217;s still amazing compared to the crash prone days of  Mac OS 9 and Win 9X that I had to mention it too. 




Jish, I went looking for the trasparent dock app after I took the screenshot, and I like it. &lt;b&gt;update:&lt;/b&gt; I'm sick of it now, the color of the triangle below the app is hard to see with some colors - the contrasted background is actually useful.



Anil, I hadn't thought about the Word instances, good point. I guess it isn't all that uncommon.



Ok, here are the apps from left to right:



Fire, IE, OmniWeb, Entourage, BBEdit, Interarchy, Photoshop 7, &lt;b&gt;BlogApp&lt;/b&gt;, iTunes, SlashDock (not actually running), LaunchBar, Stickies, System Preferences, Timbuktu, Terminal, CPU monitor, GraphicConverter, Project Builder, Interface Builder, Word v.X, Preview, and Text edit. The house is just a folder icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m mentioning it not because it can&#8217;t be done on a Windows machine (I realize that with XP and <span class="caps">OS X</span> almost anything can be done on either operating system), but is it really as seamless &#8230; out of the way? It just struck me as a usability shift for me. I just happened to be running 20 applications, not because I was testing it, but it just happened because I needed or wanted those apps running. When I first installed <span class="caps">OS X</span> last year when it came out, I performed a search for file of type &#8220;application&#8221; and opened them all strait from Sherlock. Granted there is no real use for this, and most of the apps are small utilities (as are some in this list) but it&#8217;s still amazing compared to the crash prone days of  Mac <span class="caps">OS 9</span> and Win 9X that I had to mention it too.</p>
<p>Jish, I went looking for the trasparent dock app after I took the screenshot, and I like it. <b>update:</b> I&#8217;m sick of it now, the color of the triangle below the app is hard to see with some colors &#8211; the contrasted background is actually useful.</p>
<p>Anil, I hadn&#8217;t thought about the Word instances, good point. I guess it isn&#8217;t all that uncommon.</p>
<p>Ok, here are the apps from left to right:</p>
<p>Fire, IE, OmniWeb, Entourage, BBEdit, Interarchy, Photoshop 7, <b>BlogApp</b>, iTunes, SlashDock (not actually running), LaunchBar, Stickies, System Preferences, Timbuktu, Terminal, <span class="caps">CPU</span> monitor, GraphicConverter, Project Builder, Interface Builder, Word v.X, Preview, and Text edit. The house is just a folder icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>Are you fucking kidding me? Tim are you reading this crap people are writing?
I feel like I should be at a Star Trek convention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you fucking kidding me? Tim are you reading this crap people are writing?<br />
I feel like I should be at a Star Trek convention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>Ozzy, welcome to the "Internet".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ozzy, welcome to the &#8220;Internet&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viehauser</title>
		<link>http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Viehauser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/07/12/multitasking/#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>hi ozzy,  Tim, i didnt know you could use a computer for so much stuff....  all i do is look at porn and play golf and type on the internet to hot chicks!
wow, i have to try some of this other stuff!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ozzy,  Tim, i didnt know you could use a computer for so much stuff&#8230;.  all i do is look at porn and play golf and type on the internet to hot chicks!<br />
wow, i have to try some of this other stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
