Comments on: How not to build a splash screen http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/ adding insult to injury since 1999 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:50:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Periferal http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1066 Periferal Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1066 Oh man, that's good flash. Oh man, that’s good flash.

]]> By: Jako http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1067 Jako Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1067 That's not a woman! THAT'S A MAAAAN, BABY!!! YEAH! That’s not a woman!

THAT’S A MAAAAN, BABY YEAH!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1068 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1068 I was going to make a "Pat" reference, but decided to let it slide. Thanks for picking up the slack. --not logged in, Tim I was going to make a “Pat” reference, but decided to let it slide. Thanks for picking up the slack.

—not logged in,

Tim

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1069 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.saltedwound.com/archives/2002/04/05/how-not-to-build-a-splash-screen/#comment-1069 Xtreme Web Solutions designed that site and like many of the other sites they designed decided to plague the user with a useless introduction. Their own site was just as bad. If I recall their intro took over 2 minutes to load(56k) and had no option to skip the intro. Perhaps their total ignorance to usability was a factor leading to their demise? Xtreme Web Solutions designed that site and like many of the other sites they designed decided to plague the user with a useless introduction. Their own site was just as bad. If I recall their intro took over 2 minutes to load(56k) and had no option to skip the intro. Perhaps their total ignorance to usability was a factor leading to their demise?

]]>